Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Wake Up Middle Class!

With Obama’s plan to let the Bush Tax cuts expire in 2010, there has been an onslaught of media attention concerning his budgetary decisions. Phrases like “socialism”, “re-distribution of wealth”, and “tax hikes” are being associated with President Obama’s fiscal policies to discredit his approach. Obama has been open and direct concerning who his tax policies are targeting. The interesting part of the situation? There has never been such an uproar from the middle class fighting for the benefits of the wealthy.

Now to be clear I have little issue with the wealthy, or their personal incomes. Athletes, actors, stock brokers, and executives are all paid based on market conditions. I do believe that the wealthy are the largest benefactors of governmental regulation. We live in a mixed market economy, not a free market. The government regulates trade, blocks monopolies, and protects intellectual property. Almost all of the bailout money went to save the shareholders of large corporations and free up credit markets which have the largest impact on the wealthy.

The richest Americans have been the largest recipients of tax cuts over the past 30 years. Starting with Jimmy Carter’s administration, the highest tax rates have been cut in half to present day levels (70% to 35%). The wealthy have also seen the largest jump in income. From 1992 to 2004 upper class income rose from 111,000 to 154,000 (+39%). Over the same time period median wages only increased from 39,000 to 43,000 (+10%). So, over the past 30 years the wealthy have seen their taxes decrease by 50%, and their incomes increase by 39%. (Inflation adjusted for all above examples)

What many Americans do not realize is the vast redistribution of wealth over this period. Whenever tax rates are cut disproportionately, tax burden shifts among classes. Regarding the 2002 and 2003 tax cuts, families making $60,000 saw their tax payments drop by $1,000. In contrast, the wealthiest 1% saw their annual tax bill drop by $58,000. This resulted in a dramatic swing in tax burden to the middle and lower classes and redistributed wealth to the upper class.

President Obama’s plan is to close the gap on the federal deficit by allowing the Bush tax cuts of 2002 and 2003 to expire. This would increase the tax bracket of the wealthiest (single taxpayer making more then $357,000) from 35% currently, to 39%.*** This would return some of the tax burden back to the wealthy, and redistribute the wealth back to the middle class. Before the middle class rejects Obama's policies, they should remember upper class Americans never asked for the Bush tax cuts, and certainly didn't need them.

____________________________________________________
***Now, before you drop your jaw regarding these figures remember this is a bracket, and tax brackets can be misleading. A family of four with household income of $365,000 claiming $100,000 in deductions actually pays about 17% in income tax. In comparison, an average family of four with income of 150,000 and deductions of $30,000 falls into a 25% bracket, but only pays about 12% in tax. An average family of four with income of 70,000 and no deductions falls into a 15% bracket, but only pays about 5% in tax.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So true. This especially annoyed me during the election, as it seems most of the low-income people bashing Obama's tax policies felt the need to stand up for the rich. Say what? Like the whole Joe-the-Plumber trainwreck. What a mess.

I wonder if part of it isn't some hope these people have inside that they'll be making more that 250k in the next 8 years. It's tough to admit that you might not make as much as someone else for the forseable future. It's like admitting you're mediocre. Only in this case, mediocre is really awesome. Yeah, I hate to think I might only make 200k 6 years from now, so I'll object to the tax increases.

3/05/2009 12:39 AM  
Blogger Letterpress said...

Great post, Matthew. I can't pretend to leave any erudite comment, so I'll just say thanks.

3/05/2009 10:08 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Did you copy and paste these tax rate scenarios from an uncredited source or did you do extensive research to arrive at these tax rate scenarios yourself?

You can always tell what a fool read yesterday because he is regurgitating it today like some sort of expert - selfishly pretending that his ideas are fresh and original.

But seriously, do you really think Obama can deliver on ANY of his campaign promises?

How many has he already broken?

5/13/2009 10:36 PM  
Blogger Hermana Anselmo said...

I plugged the scenarios in myself using an online 1040 tax calculator. Try this one:

http://www.dinkytown.net/java/Tax1040.html

I have helped friend and family with over 30 returns in the past 5 years and have become familiar with tax rate scenarios.

Everything you see on my blog is fresh. If I pull from another source I site it. Your weak accusations of plagiarism are insulting. Next time try to kill the message instead of the messenger.

5/13/2009 11:54 PM  
Blogger Hermana Anselmo said...

Ricky --
One more thing. If you want to see how many campaign promises Obama has broken, there is a website designed to track:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

5/13/2009 11:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home